Friday, May 4, 2012

The Liberal Woman's Paradox


Feminism, I thought, was supposed to liberate women – to pave the way for opportunities and to give women choices. Women do not need to be homemakers or stay-at-home moms in modern society, but neither do they need to have a career outside the home to be of value. Some overly vocal liberals do not seem to get this, or if they do, they have disdain for women who do not work outside the home.

Never Worked a Day

Liberal strategist Hilary Rosen verbalized this all too common disparagement when she said Ann Romney, mother of five, has never worked a day in her life. Romney graciously reminded Rosen that she chose to raise her children and that people need to respect the choices of others.

Uneducated Women

Just a few days after Rosen’s arrogant remark came another gem from NPR’s Mara Liasson on Weekend Edition Sunday. Liasson made a distinction between “stay-at-home moms” and “educated women.” NPR immediately tried to pretend this never happened by scrubbing the clip and the transcript displayed on the website. But the damage was done. Although Liasson claimed to misspeak, listeners that day heard what she really thinks.

Liberal Arrogance

The Democratic Party likes to pretend it is the voice of women. If that were true, the Party would not be filled with women who look down their noses at others who don’t fall into their ideal of what a woman should be. Many liberal women in the Democratic Party think they are better than stay-at-home moms, period, end of story.

Nothing New

This is nothing new. Teresa Heinz Kerry put down Laura Bush, and Hilary Clinton mocked all stay-at-homes. Kerry accused Bush of never having a real job. Clinton said she chose to fulfill her profession instead of staying home to bake cookies and have teas.

Human Connections

The Democratic Party is supposed to be fighting for women’s policies. How is anyone supposed to believe that when the women in it show such contempt for people who do the most difficult job there is to do well? The success of our country depends on how well we raise our children. Female liberal politicians should keep that in mind.




Friday, February 24, 2012

I Redefined Luxury


Trying to raise a family and indulging my taste for luxury do not always coincide. When the economy took a turn for the worse after the housing market collapsed, I decided I had better make some changes.

I have always loved to shop, and it got to the point that I was buying Tiffany & Co. for my daughters and too many Coach bags for myself. I knew that this needed to stop, but that was more easily said than done. Luxury was still important to me, so I redefined what luxury was.

The bottom line is that luxury should be something that brings personal fulfillment – not something that involves brand names in an effort to impress others. Luxury is still important to me, but I found that it could embody life’s simple pleasures. Find out more about how you can rethink luxury by reading an article I wrote about redefining luxury.

Photo by Carol Kramberger


Saturday, January 21, 2012

Congress Caves on SOPA/PIPA






Power to the people has not been as strong as it was on blackout day regarding SOPA and PIPA since the hippie anti-war protests of the 1960s. Because millions of Internet users contacted Congress to stop legislation on bills that would result in Internet censorship, Congress indefinitely postponed SOPA and PIPA legislation. It looks as if we are safe, for a while anyway. But the government wants control of the Internet, and I’m afraid some other scheme will rear its head sooner or later. If you want some background on the situation, check out my article about SOPA and PIPA really being about government control. Saying it was about Internet piracy was just a front.


Friday, January 20, 2012

South Carolina Debate Started Off Lively


As I watched the candidates take the stage, I knew I would be open-minded to anything they had to say – all except Rick Santorum that is. He lost me before the South Carolina debate even happened when he compared gay marriage to polygamy. So the debate for me was among three people: Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney (and in that order).

The South Carolina debate had some good one-liners, but I was disappointed that the national debt was not a topic. Ron Paul was able to mention a couple of times though that he plans to cut $1 trillion his first year in office, mostly by getting rid of entitlements. I guess the debate never went there because no one wants to discuss that the United States is bankrupt. At any rate, if you want to see some of the memorable quotes from the debate and why Newt Gingrich received a standing O, check out my commentary from Yahoo! News.